HumanSignal vs Lilt
How the two compare for AI training work, using pay and job counts from listings that are open right now.
 HumanSignal |  Lilt | |
|---|---|---|
| Open jobs here | 28 | 412 |
| Median pay | $10.45/hr | Not enough data |
| Typical range | $8–$14.30/hr | Not enough data |
| Highest posted | $100/hr | Not enough data |
| Rating | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Would recommend | 0% | 0% |
| Hires most for | AI & Data Training, Image & Video Annotation | Linguistic Annotation, Bilingual LLM & Translation, Transcription & Audio Training |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Country limits | None listed | None listed |
About HumanSignal
Creators of Label Studio, the most widely adopted open-source data labeling platform, helping teams build high-quality AI training datasets.
HumanSignal pay, process, and 28 open jobsAbout Lilt
AI-powered translation platform combining human expertise with adaptive language technology for enterprise localization.
Lilt pay, process, and 412 open jobsCommon questions
Which has more open jobs, HumanSignal or Lilt?
Lilt has 412 open AI training jobs here, compared with 28 at HumanSignal.
Can I work for both HumanSignal and Lilt?
Usually, yes. Most AI training work is freelance or contract, and many people work on several platforms to keep a steady flow of tasks. Check each contract for exclusivity terms.