Innodata vs Lilt
How the two compare for AI training work, using pay and job counts from listings that are open right now.
 Innodata |  Lilt | |
|---|---|---|
| Open jobs here | 84 | 412 |
| Median pay | $15/hr | Not enough data |
| Typical range | $15–$15/hr | Not enough data |
| Highest posted | $82.93/hr | Not enough data |
| Rating | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Would recommend | 0% | 0% |
| Hires most for | AI Expert - Humanities, AI & Data Training, AI Expert - Machine Learning & AI Research | Linguistic Annotation, Bilingual LLM & Translation, Transcription & Audio Training |
| Founded | 1988 | 2015 |
| Country limits | None listed | None listed |
About Innodata
Global data engineering company founded in 1988, providing AI training data, annotation, and evaluation services with 4,000+ experts across 40+ languages.
Innodata pay, process, and 84 open jobsAbout Lilt
AI-powered translation platform combining human expertise with adaptive language technology for enterprise localization.
Lilt pay, process, and 412 open jobsCommon questions
Which has more open jobs, Innodata or Lilt?
Lilt has 412 open AI training jobs here, compared with 84 at Innodata.
Can I work for both Innodata and Lilt?
Usually, yes. Most AI training work is freelance or contract, and many people work on several platforms to keep a steady flow of tasks. Check each contract for exclusivity terms.