Lilt vs Prolific
How the two compare for AI training work, using pay and job counts from listings that are open right now.
 Lilt |  Prolific | |
|---|---|---|
| Open jobs here | 412 | 591 |
| Median pay | Not enough data | $30/hr |
| Typical range | Not enough data | $23–$115/hr |
| Highest posted | Not enough data | $200/hr |
| Rating | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Would recommend | 0% | 0% |
| Hires most for | Linguistic Annotation, Bilingual LLM & Translation, Transcription & Audio Training | Data Annotation & Labeling, Linguistic Annotation, AI Expert - Clinical & Medical |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Country limits | None listed | None listed |
About Lilt
AI-powered translation platform combining human expertise with adaptive language technology for enterprise localization.
Lilt pay, process, and 412 open jobsAbout Prolific
Trusted research platform connecting participants with academic and commercial studies.
Prolific pay, process, and 591 open jobsCommon questions
Which has more open jobs, Lilt or Prolific?
Prolific has 591 open AI training jobs here, compared with 412 at Lilt.
Can I work for both Lilt and Prolific?
Usually, yes. Most AI training work is freelance or contract, and many people work on several platforms to keep a steady flow of tasks. Check each contract for exclusivity terms.