LXT vs Prolific
How the two compare for AI training work, using pay and job counts from listings that are open right now.
 Prolific | ||
|---|---|---|
| Open jobs here | 20 | 591 |
| Median pay | $17.50/hr | $30/hr |
| Typical range | $15.25–$19.75/hr | $23–$115/hr |
| Highest posted | $22/hr | $200/hr |
| Rating | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Would recommend | 0% | 0% |
| Hires most for | Real-world Data Collection, Transcription & Audio Training, QA Reviewer / Auditor | Data Annotation & Labeling, Linguistic Annotation, AI Expert - Clinical & Medical |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Country limits | None listed | None listed |
About LXT
Global AI training data provider offering data collection, annotation, and generative AI evaluation in 1,000+ languages.
LXT pay, process, and 20 open jobsAbout Prolific
Trusted research platform connecting participants with academic and commercial studies.
Prolific pay, process, and 591 open jobsCommon questions
Does LXT or Prolific pay more?
Based on live listings, Prolific pays more: a median of $30/hr against $17.50/hr at LXT.
Which has more open jobs, LXT or Prolific?
Prolific has 591 open AI training jobs here, compared with 20 at LXT.
Can I work for both LXT and Prolific?
Usually, yes. Most AI training work is freelance or contract, and many people work on several platforms to keep a steady flow of tasks. Check each contract for exclusivity terms.