Domain Expert Reviewer - Science & Technology

About Turing: Based in San Francisco, California, Turing is the world's leading research accelerator for frontier AI labs and a trusted partner for global enterprises deploying advanced AI systems. Turing supports customers in two ways: first, by accelerating frontier research with high-quality data, advanced training pipelines, plus top AI researchers who specialize in coding, reasoning, STEM, multilinguality, multimodality, and agents; and second, by applying that expertise to help enterprises transform AI from proof of concept into proprietary intelligence with systems that perform reliably, deliver measurable impact, and drive lasting results on the P&L.

Role Overview:

We are seeking a highly qualified Science & Technology Domain Reviewer to support the quality assurance of Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation projects. In this role, you will review domain-specific prompts, evaluate completed tasks for accuracy and quality, ensure adherence to project guidelines, and provide actionable feedback to maintain high annotation standards. Your expertise in science and technology will help ensure the reliability, consistency, and quality of AI evaluation data across a broad range of scientific and technological topics.

Key Responsibilities

Review and validate domain-specific prompts covering physics, chemistry, biology, engineering, artificial intelligence, computer science, emerging technologies, and related fields. Evaluate completed tasks to ensure factual accuracy, reasoning quality, completeness, technical correctness, and compliance with project guidelines. Identify factual inaccuracies, logical inconsistencies, hallucinations, outdated information, and low-quality annotations. Ensure prompts are challenging, relevant, and aligned with project objectives. Provide clear, constructive, and evidence-based feedback to contributors to improve task quality. Maintain consistency across reviews by following established quality standards and review guidelines. Escalate ambiguous or technically complex cases when necessary and document review findings. Collaborate with project managers and AI teams to continuously improve evaluation quality and review processes.

Minimum Qualifications

Master's degree or higher in Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Engineering, Computer Science, Information Technology, Artificial Intelligence, or another closely related Science & Technology discipline. Minimum 3 years of professional, research, teaching, or industry experience in a relevant science or technology field. Prior experience reviewing, evaluating, editing, or quality-checking technical or domain-specific content is preferred. Excellent written English communication and analytical skills. Strong attention to detail and the ability to identify factual, logical, and technical errors.

Preferred Qualifications

Experience reviewing AI-generated content, LLM evaluations, prompt engineering, or annotation quality. Familiarity with quality assurance, editorial review, or technical content evaluation workflows. Strong understanding of scientific principles, technological advancements, and emerging technologies. Ability to provide objective, evidence-based feedback while maintaining consistent quality standards. Experience working independently in a fast-paced, quality-focused environment.

Offer Details:

Commitments Required: 40 hours per week with at least 4 hours PST overlap Employment type: Contractor assignment (no medical/paid leave) Duration of contract: 8 weeks.