HireArt vs Lilt
How the two compare for AI training work, using pay and job counts from listings that are open right now.
 HireArt |  Lilt | |
|---|---|---|
| Open jobs here | 5 | 412 |
| Median pay | $29.50/hr | Not enough data |
| Typical range | $25–$30/hr | Not enough data |
| Highest posted | $30/hr | Not enough data |
| Rating | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Would recommend | 0% | 0% |
| Hires most for | AI & Data Training, Bilingual LLM & Translation, Audio Annotation | Linguistic Annotation, Bilingual LLM & Translation, Transcription & Audio Training |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Country limits | None listed | None listed |
About HireArt
Full-stack contract workforce platform connecting vetted AI trainers, data annotators, and specialists with enterprises through rigorous pre-screening.
HireArt pay, process, and 5 open jobsAbout Lilt
AI-powered translation platform combining human expertise with adaptive language technology for enterprise localization.
Lilt pay, process, and 412 open jobsCommon questions
Which has more open jobs, HireArt or Lilt?
Lilt has 412 open AI training jobs here, compared with 5 at HireArt.
Can I work for both HireArt and Lilt?
Usually, yes. Most AI training work is freelance or contract, and many people work on several platforms to keep a steady flow of tasks. Check each contract for exclusivity terms.